To the Barricades
Stanford Professor
Dan Edelstein has written a very academic intellectual history of the idea of political
revolutions. To the ancients up to the time of the French Revolution the whole
idea of revolution was disturbing. It meant a useless cycle of destruction as
society moved from tyrannical to mob rule with nothing being accomplished.
From Professor
Edelstein I learned of Polybius a Greek historian writing in the time of the
Roman Republic. Polybius endorsed the idea of a “balanced constitution” that distributed
executive, legislative and judicial power, sounds familiar. His writings
greatly influenced the founders of the American republic. Edelstein views the
American Revolution as “radical conservatism” designed to “preserve the state.”
This produced the American constitution which to the frustration of the extreme
right and the extreme left forces policies into the center.
All of this changed
with the French Revolution where the idea of progress took hold. The belief in
progress meant that a revolution could bring about a glorious future and
instead of having a balanced constitution it excused dictatorship in the hope
that it would bring about a better world to come. To Edelstein, dictatorship
was not an exception, but rather a feature of modern revolutions. Starting with
Napoleon in 1799, to the Latin American caudillos of the early 1800’s, to
Lenin, Mao, and Khomeini.
This is a hard book
for the lay reader, but for those interested in the idea of revolution it is
well worth slogging through.
No comments:
Post a Comment