NATO: R.I.P., b.1949 - d. 2026?

NATO is dead, or in the process of dying. NATO was born when the United States stood alone militarily and economically as the West's  power while Europe was weak. Europe is no longer weak, but it certainly acts that way. If if it had the will, Europe would be capable of defending itself. Hence the founding predicate of NATO no longer holds.

The proximate cause of NATO's demise was President Trump's announcing his willingness to seize Greenland by force from NATO ally Denmark earlier this year, (See:Shulmaven: Donnie Does Davos* and Mayhem in Minneapolis ) his failure to consult on his war plans to attack Iran, and most important the the obstruction of NATO allies Spain, France and Italy to deny their respective airspaces to the U.S. Air Force's efforts to to attack Iran. Indeed they even denied access to the U.S. air bases in those countries. It is one thing for them to be passive, it is far another thing to actually obstruct the U.S. military. 

It is not as if NATO has no skin in the game in the Persian Gulf. Indeed their economies are suffering far more from the rise in the price of oil than the U.S. I don't know what, if anything, President Trump will say tonight on NATO, but the clock is ticking on its demise. Further it will require congressional approval for the United States to withdraw from NATO. Of course, the only winner in this will be Russia's Putin

Donnie Does Davos* and Mayhem in Minneapolis

 It was quite a week. We had President Trump on the scene in Davos doing his best to break up NATO with his threats to acquire Greenland by force. (See: Shulmaven: History Rhyming with Trump and Greenland ) His histrionics certainly put the conference back on the map and it made him the focal point of attention. That was his plan all along, because he quickly retreated. The conference ended with Trump's setting up his so-called Board of Peace which by its makeup looks more like a Board of War.

But not before Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney gave him a scathing rebuke calling out his attempt to "rupture the world order." Indeed, the world might have changed last week. Carney is now the hero of the Davos set but I would your attention to the facts that he threw Israel under the bus by recognizing the Palestinian state and he has done nothing to bring a halt to the surging antisemitism in Canada. Thus he is hardly the paragon of Western virtue.

Meantime Minneapolis has exploded in a wave of mayhem culminating in ICE officers claiming their second (alleged) murder victim. With 3,000 ICE officers confronting 25,000 protestors on a daily basis in frigid temperatures things have and will continue to go south very quickly.  ICE looks like an occupying army out for revenge. Whatever Trump's motivations are, it is not helping his agenda as his polls collapse. Indeed, the entire enforcement operation is taking the focus off the real Medicaid scandal in Minnesota and he is making a hero out of the hapless governor, Tim Walz who is likely up to his eyeballs in corruption.

Finally, as of this writing Trump is a pulling an Obama (remember the Syrian redline of 2013) by failing to live up to his promise to support the Iranian protestors. Mass murder has taken place on his watch, and by encouraging the protestors, Trump set them up to be slaughtered on a mass scale by the Ayatollahs. 

*-With apologies to "Debbie Does Dallas" a 1978 porn classic.

Greenland Compromise: Rent, not Buy

Yesterday I wrote about how Trump is following in the footsteps of Hitler and Stalin over his demand to buy Greenland from Denmark. (See: https://shulmaven.blogspot.com/2026/01/history-rhyming-with-trump-and-greenland.html ) Today Trump said he would not use force to takeover the island, but he certainly did not rule out other forms of coercion. 

My sense is that Trump's art of the deal is aiming for de facto, but not de jure, control of Greenland. Denmark has been very adamant that Greenland is not for sale. Denmark has not commented on whether or not it could be rented. Remember, Trump is a real estate guy. So here goes my idea as one way that Trump could get what he wants.

Instead of purchasing Greenland, the U.S enters into a 99-year lease arrangement with Denmark. The lease terms would give the U.S. full operating control over the island in exchange for an annual lease payment amounting to X- $ billions.  That would more than fund Denmark's current obligations to the 56,000 member Greenland community and then some. Thus Denmark would still retain nominal sovereignty over the Greenland and the island would still fly the Danish flag. 

This result is not pretty, but that is the way negotiations could end up.