Never Give Up, Never Sit on a Lead
Political journalist A.J. Baime tells
the often told story of Truman’s come from behind victory over Dewey with great
insight and drama, no easy feat. Simply put President Harry Truman never gave
up and New York Governor Thomas Dewey sat on a lead. Further Truman was
handicapped by having Progressive Henry Wallace run to his left and Dixiecrat
Strom Thurmond run well to the right thereby splitting the Democratic Party.
Of interest is that contrary to the
title the election was not about America’s soul. Dewey and Truman agreed on
international affairs, expanding social security, supporting a federal role in
housing and on civil rights. As governor of New York Dewey pushed through the
first major civil rights legislation in country. To be sure during the campaign
Truman was far more full-throated in his support for civil rights. Dewey along
with his running mate California Governor Earl Warren were perhaps the two best
governors in America at the time. Had they won, my guess is that it would have
been a successful administration.
What Truman understood is that there was
a fundamental split between liberal Dewey and the largely conservative
congress. Truman was not running against Dewey, per se, but rather on cross country
whistle stop tour he lambasted the do nothing Republican Congress while begging
for cash to keep the campaign going. While Truman was outlining specific
programs, Dewey was mouthing the platitude of “unity.”
Truman had more on his mind than winning
re-election. He was running the Berlin Airlift, negotiating with the Russians
in Paris and dealing with the Arab-Israel War. He also found the time to order
the integration of the armed forces.
Baime is especially good on his
discussion of the Wallace campaign, a campaign largely run by a Communist Party
cell. Wallace praised Stalin and attacked the Marshall Plan with great
vehemence. Along the way he attracted a coterie of celebrities who objectively
acted as, in Lenin’s term, “useful idiots.”
Then why did Truman win against all odds
and with 90% of the newspapers against him including The New York Times. Baime
suggests it was a combination of broad prosperity, strong labor union support,
the Black vote in the great urban centers, technical changes in farm
legislation that made it hard for farmers to profitably store their 1948 bumper
crop and perhaps most important, the American people admired Truman’s spunk. It
makes for a great read.
For the full Amazon URL see:https://www.amazon.com/review/R1J52ZAO05J9HG/ref=pe_1098610_137716200_cm_rv_eml_rv0_rv
No comments:
Post a Comment