Global Capitalism 1.0
University of London history professor
Donald Sassoon could have written a great book for the lay reader describing
the first global epoch of capitalism. Unfortunately he took all of the drama
out of one of the most dramatic eras in world economic history. Perhaps I am
being too harsh because of my amateur status, but his 768 page book, although
loaded with information, is a long and difficult slog.
Sassoon’s book lacks the drama of Marx’s
1848 “Communist Manifesto” where praises how the rising capitalist bourgeoisie
was transforming Europe. Where Marx showed excitement Sassoon is plodding. Much
later Keynes’s “Economic Consequences…” highlights what was available to
England’s pre-war bourgeoisie with the mere dialing of a telephone (no
telephones in 1860). It would have been nice if he described the life of the
bourgeoisie and the working class of 1860 and compared it to that of 1914. The
world changed for better for both classes. It would have helped if Sassoon
studied Robert Gordon’s “The Rise and Fall of American Growth.” Remember that
the first global age began with the telegraph and the steamship and ended with
the telephone, electric lights and the internal combustion engine, all three
invented around 1879. It was those three inventions created under capitalist
auspices that changed the world.
For a history of capitalism, very few
capitalists are mentioned. I was hoping to learn about the methods and vision of
the European and Japanese capitalists who built their societies, but came away
disappointed. The author describes the rise of capitalism in a host of
countries, but he doesn’t put flesh and bones on it. He seems to be more
interested in the political leadership than the rising capitalist class.
He further sets up a straw man by
arguing that the neo-liberals of the 1980s harkened back to a capitalist nirvana
of the 1860s when government’s role in the economy was small. He rightly states
that government played a major role in capitalist development everywhere and
practically all neo-liberals knew it. Sassoon favored more government involvement
and he appears to be very sympathetic to the German protectionist of the 1840s Friedrich
List.
Where Sassoon is good is his discussion on
the huge profits Britain generated from the sale of opium to China and that
colonialism, especially in Africa, wasn’t all that profitable for Europe. Most
trade took place among the more developed countries. He also highlights that
much of 19th century America was built with European capital.
My sense is that only the nerdiest of
lay readers will find this book of interest. There is a lot here but it takes
time to plow through.
For the full Amazon URL see: https://www.amazon.com/review/R1EG4VG2S3487Z/ref=pe_1098610_137716200_cm_rv_eml_rv0_rv
No comments:
Post a Comment