Passing the Baton
Kori Schake, Deputy Director-General for
Institute for Strategic Studies, London has written an important book as to how
a declining power peacefully passes the baton to a rising power. The operative
word here is peacefully, because in most cases the two powers fall into what
Graham Allison has called the Thucydides Trap where the ancient historian noted
“it was the rise in Athens and the fear this instilled in Sparta that made war
inevitable.” The importance of Schake’s book is that today the world is faced
not with the rise of the U.S. and the decline of Britain, but rather with the
rise of China and the decline of the United States.
Her book begins with the Monroe Doctrine
of 1823, where she notes that it was a British idea to begin with, to the end
of World War II. In the case of the Monroe Doctrine Britain was seeking to
preserve its commercial interests with the newly independent Latin American
countries and the U.S was more than happy to have the British navy enforce the
doctrine. In fact one of the reasons for the Monroe Doctrine was the Russian
presence just north of San Francisco. Both the U.S. and Britain were fortunate
to have John Quincy Adams as Secretary of State and the Britain to have George
Canning as Foreign Secretary.
Schake then goes on to discuss the
Oregon boundary dispute of the late 1840s, the Civil War, the Venezuelan crises
of 1895-1905, the Spanish American War, World War I, the Washington Naval
Conference of 1922 and World War II. She highlights how Britain feared U.S.
interference in British politics during the Civil War that worked to keep
Britain out as many Brits sympathized with America’s republican values and the
presence of Irish and Scottish immigrants in the U.S. who still had strong ties
to the home country. The Brits certainly did not want to encourage secession.
By the time the Venezuelan Crises came
around Britain began to fear America’s growing power and instead of fighting
the powers worked together. Simply put Britain began to treat the U.S. as an
equal and further it had worries much closer to home with the rise of Germany. Indeed
the British Navy actually supported Admiral Dewey in the battle of Manila Bay. Again
both parties were lucky to have such statesman as Hay and Salisbury. Moreover by
1900 the two countries were becoming more alike. The U.S. was become more
imperialist and Britain became more democratic. Simply put The U.S. was first
willing to accept Britain’s rules based hegemony and later Britain would accept
the rules laid down by America.
That became apparent at the Washington
Naval Conference where the once mighty British navy accepted American parity in
the Pacific. It was a diplomatic victory for President Warren Harding.
With the coming of World War II Britain
was forced to accept American hegemony. They had no choice and under the new
rules its empire would have to go. In return for American support again the
Brits had no choice.
The question for us today that would the
U.S. and China be so lucky. Schake thinks not. There is far less commonality
and it isn’t clear that on the U.S. side we will we have statesman on the
caliber of John Quincy Adams and John Hay. One can only hope.
The full amazon URL appears at: https://www.amazon.com/review/R1OM24BW8GQPI1/ref=pe_1098610_137716200_cm_rv_eml_rv0_rv
No comments:
Post a Comment