Monday, March 18, 2019

"Global Slowdown," UCLA Anderson Forecast, March 2019


Global Slowdown
David Shulman
Senior Economist
UCLA Anderson Forecast
March 2019

A year ago we were looking forward to a synchronized global expansion; today we are staring a synchronized slowdown. The U.S. economy is part and parcel with the global slowdown, an eventuality we have been forecasting for over a year. After growing at 3.1% clip on a fourth quarter-to-fourth quarter basis in 2018, growth will slow to 1.7% in 2019 and to a near recession pace of 1.1% in 2020. However by mid-2021 growth is once again forecast to be around 2%. (See Figure 1) Similarly payroll employment growth is forecast to decline from the 220,000 a month recorded in 2018 to about 160,000 a month in 2019 to a negligible 20,000 a month in 2020 with actual declines occurring at the end of that year. (See Figure 2) In this environment the unemployment rate will initially decline from January’s 3.9% to 3.6% later in the year and then gradually rise to 4.2% in early 2021. (See Figure 3)

Figure 1. Real GDP Growth, 2011Q1 -2021Q4F, Percent Change SAAR






Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast

Figure 2. Payroll Employment, 2011Q1 -2021Q4, Millions, SAAR



Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and UCLA Anderson Forecast
Figure 3. Unemployment Rate, 2011Q1 -2021Q4, Percent, SAAR







Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and UCLA Anderson Forecast

Why the Slowdown?

Consistent with our view for the past several quarters we believe that the 3% growth in 2018 was a one-off based on the fiscal stimulus coming from the tax cuts and spending increases, especially for defense enacted in late 2017 and the lagged effects of the extraordinarily easy monetary policy pursued by the Federal Reserve. With the effects of the fiscal stimulus now waning combined with the partial normalization of interest rates it seemed inevitable to us that growth would slow. Further the failure of housing activity to provide a propellant for the expansion has been a distinct negative. We will discuss these points in greater detail later. The slowdown in U.S. economic activity will be exacerbated by concomitant weakness among our global trading partners.

 Global Economy Stalling

Although 2018 started out strong for the global economy, by yearend there seemed to be weakness everywhere. The weakness is being amplified by the protectionist policies being employed by the Trump Administration and the uncertainties associated with BREXIT. For example compared to 2018 German growth is expected to slow from 1.5% to 1.3%, China from 6.6% to 6.2% and Italy is for all practical purposes in recession. Although these declines in growth appear modest, recent data suggests that there will be substantial downward revisions to the outlook once first quarter data become available.[i]  The global weakness will be transmitted to the U.S. economy by a less than robust export environment and a reduction in corporate profits.



See Figure 4. Real GDP Growth for Major Economies, 2018 -2020, Percent

Region/Country
2018
2019
2020
U.S.
2.9
2.5
1.8
Euro Zone
1.8
1.6
1.7
  Germany
1.5
1.3
1.6
  France
1.5
1.5
1.6
  Italy
1.0
0.6
0.9
UK
1.4
1.5
1.6
Japan
0.9
1.1
0.5
Developing Asia
  China
6.6
6.2
6.2
  India
7.3
7.5
7.7
Americas
  Canada
2.1
1.9
1.7
  Mexico
2.1
2.1
2.2
  Brazil
1.3
2.5
2.2

Source: World Economic Outlook, International Monetary Fund, January 2019

This economic weakness has triggered a major contraction in global interest rates making it difficult for the Fed to conduct its normalization policy and has put a lid on long term interest rates. Would you believe .09% for the German 10-year Bund and a negative .60% for the 2-year. (See Figure 5) Where in the recent past we thought yields on 10-year U.S. Treasury would to top out over 4%, we now think that a 3.25% peak is more likely as German interest rates work to suppress U.S. yields. (See Fed discussion below)

Figure 5. Selected Global Interest Rates, 22Feb19, Percent

Country
2-Year
10-Yr.
U.S.
2.50
2.65
Germany
-0.60
0.09
France
-0.46
0.52
Italy
0.54
2.87
U.K.
0.74
1.15
Japan
-0.18
-0.05
                               
Source: CNBC

A Fundamental Shift in Fed Policy

The combination of the global slowdown, the 20% sell-off in stock prices in the fourth quarter and still quiescent inflation triggered a fundamental shift in Fed policy. Instead of penciling three or four rate hikes next year, it now looks like it will be zero or one. We are in the one rate hike camp for 2019 camp because we believe that inflation will be less than benign. However, because we are more pessimistic on the real economy than the Fed, we are forecasting that there will be three rate cuts of 25 basis points each in 2020. (See Figure 6) In this setting of very slow growth and an end to the Fed normalization process coupled with very low interest rates in Europe and Japan it is hard to see long term interest rates going much above 3.25%.

Figure 6. Federal Funds vs. 10-Year U.S. Treasury Bonds, 2011Q1 -2021Q4F



Sources: Federal Reserve Board and UCLA Anderson Forecast

Moreover it now looks like the Fed is rethinking its balance sheet target. Instead or contracting its balance sheet from the $4.5 trillion peak to $3 trillion or below, it now looks like the shrinkage process will end this year with a balance sheet of around $3.5 trillion. (Figure 7) This change in policy will put less pressure on the long end of the treasury curve.

Figure 7. Federal Reserve Assets, 20Feb14 – 20Feb19, In $billions

 

Source: Federal Reserve Board via FRED

Although there has been much discussion of the potential for the treasury curve to become fully inverted (long rates lower than short rates), we do not believe that will be the case. To be sure the curve is currently inverted between one and five year maturities, but we do not believe that the all-important 90- Day Treasury Bill to the 10-Year Treasury bond will invert.(See Figure 8) Similarly we do not believe the 2-10 year spread will invert on a sustained basis as well.  

Figure 8. U.S. Treasury Yield Curve 22Feb19


Source: GuruFocus.com

Modestly Higher Inflation

Inflation may not be as quiescent as the Fed thinks. As a result of the very tight labor market wages are increasing at a 3%+ clip and it is likely that the year-over-year gains will soon be running around 4%. (See Figure 9) As a result, wage pressures, especially in the service sector, will keep the core consumer prices increasing at a rate above 2%. (See Figure 10) Moreover it appears that the benefits from the collapse in oil prices is now behind us and that will elevate the rate of change in the headline consumer price index to above 2% as well (See Figure 11)

Figure 9. Total Compensation per Hour, Percent Change Year Ago






Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and UCLA Anderson Forecast

Figure 10. Headline Consumer Price Index vs. Core CPI, 2011Q1 -2021Q4F, Percent Change a Year Ago





Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and UCLA Anderson Forecast

Figure 11. Oil Price, 2011Q1 – 2021Q4F, West Texas Intermediate, $/Barrel


Sources: Commodity Research Bureau and UCLA Anderson Forecast

Investment in Intellectual Property Remains the Bright Spot

The bright spot in the economy remains investment in intellectual property. This sector largely consists of software development, motion picture/TV production and corporate R&D. Although slowing from a torrid 7% pace in 2018, this sector will continue to grow much faster than the economy over the next few years. (See Figure 12) The continued movement of corporate computing to “the cloud” and a host of new entrants into motion picture production (i.e. Amazon, Netflix, and Hulu) are buoying this sector.

Figure 12. Real Investment in Intellectual Property, 2011Q1 -2021Q4F, Percent Change, SAAR





Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast

Housing Starts Remain Below Underlying Demographic Demand

We reckon that the underlying demographic demand for housing starts to be around 1.4 million – 1.5 million units a year. We have yet to achieve that level for over a decade and we forecast that it won’t be until late 2021 that housing starts exceed an annual run rate in excess of 1.4 million units. (See Figure 13) There are number of explanation for the housing’s failure to launch. They include the after effects of the Great Recession, high levels of student loan debt, the aging in place of baby boomers that is keeping housing units off the market, the concentration of job growth in high cost metropolitan areas and environmental/zoning restrictions that are restricting supply. We believe the main culprit is the last factor.

Figure 13. Housing Starts, 2011Q1 -2021Q4, Thousands of Units, SAAR








Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census and UCLA Anderson Forecast

The Twin Deficits: Federal and Trade

The consequence of the Trump Administration’s tax and spending policy is a rising fiscal deficit. After incurring a deficit of $836 billion in FY2018, the deficit will exceed a trillion dollars a year through 2021 and beyond. (See Figure 14) Part of the increase in the deficit is due to the surge in real defense spending, but as we noted above that form of spending will soon level off at a high level. (See Figure 15)

Figure 14. Federal Deficit, FY 2011-FY 2021, In $Billions, Annual Data

                                
Sources: Office of Management and Budget and UCLA Anderson Forecast

Figure 15. Real Defense Purchases, 2011 -2021, Annual Data, Percent Change

                                  

Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast

The flip side of the budget deficit is the trade deficit. In a sense the U.S. is financing our budget deficit with the trade deficit. How so? A trade deficit implies a capital inflow to finance it. As a result the real trade deficit will increase from $920 billion in 2018 to over a trillion dollars a year over the forecast period. (See Figure 16) So much for trade protection reducing the trade deficit.

Figure 16. Real Net Exports, 2011 -2021, In $Billions, Annual Data


    
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast

Conclusion

Our forecast has been roughly consistent for over a year. We forecast that real GDP growth will slow to below 2% in 2019 and around 1% in 2020 with a modest rebound in 2021. The jolt from the very expansionary fiscal policies of the Trump Administration will soon exhaust itself and there is a very real risk of a recession in late 2020. Meantime the unemployment rate will continue to decline to 3.6%, before gradually returning to 4%. Inflation will remain modestly above 2% and after increasing the Fed Funds rate by 25 basis points mid-year, the Fed will embark on an easing policy in 2020. By 2021 real growth will return to a 2% track.







[i] See Lafourcade, Pierre and Arend Kapteyn, “Global growth now-cast: a (very) preliminary estimate for Q1,” UBS, 18 February 2019.

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

My Amazon Review of Adam Higginbotham's "Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster"


Meltdown

Adam Higginbotham’s account of the meltdown of RBMK Reactor #4 at Chernobyl and its aftermath for the most part reads like fast-paced thriller that keeps wanting you to turn the next page. Using secondary sources and direct interviews over a period of decade with many of the principals involved, the author gets you into the heads of the decision makers and the thought process that led to the meltdown and the subsequent cover-up.

On April 25th 1986 a failed safety test triggered the meltdown of Reactor #4. Radiation immediately spewed into the surrounding town of Pripyat, which was built to support the Chernobyl reactor complex. As an aside some of the heaviest fighting during World War II took place in the nearby Pripyat marshes. All of the staff at the nuclear power station lived in the town with their families. It took several days before an evacuation order was given and in nearby Kiev the planned outdoor celebration of May Day took place as radiation from the failed reactor rained down on the residents.

Higginbotham takes you very deep into the nuclear science of atomic reactors and the nature of the radiation that was leaked during and after the meltdown. At points this is heavy going, but I believe it is necessary to tell the story. Because the real story was not so much the meltdown, but the associated radiation. He tells a riveting tale of the Russian helicopter pilots dropping sand and boron into the reactor to cool it. The pilots were at enormous personal risk and in the end their brave efforts did little to cool the reactor.

The author also takes you into Moscow Hospital #6 where many of the radiation sickness patients were treated and he follows their treatment protocols. Of course most of them die, but there were several survivors that he interviewed at length.

Of course Higginbotham saves his wrath, not for the power plant operators who were put on trial for the reactor failure, but rather for the entire Soviet system that allowed inherently unsafe reactors to be put online in the first place. Simply put a major nuclear accident at an RMKB reactor was inevitable because of inherent design flaws and the faulty construction that was endemic. The Soviet system both before and during the Stagnation Period under Brezhnev could not admit failure. Both the political and scientific bureaucracies were ossified and defensive. And by the time Gorbachev arrived in 1985 the Russian people had little faith in the system.

Thus as the full horror of Chernobyl became known it became obvious that the Soviet government cared little for its citizenry and if you like you can draw a straight line from Chernobyl to the dissolution of the Soviet Union.  But I end on a word of caution; we here in the U.S. are not exempt from cover-ups. I will only cite the deception given by New York City officials that the post 9/11 air quality south of Canal Street was safe to breathe. It wasn’t.





Wednesday, February 27, 2019

The Republican Moral Eunuchs and the Magnificent 13

Yesterday the House approved a resolution of disapproval on President Trump's "national emergency" to fund his border wall by a vote of 245-182. Simply put Trump usurped the power of Congress by declaring his intention to spend $5.6 billion that was previously rejected by the Congress. 182 Republicans voted against the resolution that had President Obama done a similar thing not only would they have voted for the resolution they would have immediately started impeachment proceedings. To my mind these Republicans are moral eunuchs and deserve to be defeated in the 2020 election. They failed to uphold their oaths office to support and defend the Constitution, especially Article I which gives Congress the power of the purse.

However, standing up intense pressure from the White House and Leader  Kevin McCarthy 13 Republican Representatives voted for the resolution. I call them the magnificent 13.  They are libertarian Justin Amash (MI), Brian Fitzpatrick (PA), Mike Gallagher (WI), Jaime Herrera Beutler (WA), former CIA agent Will Hurd (TX), Dusty Johnson (SD), Thomas Massie (KY),former leadership member Cathy McMorris Rodgers (WA), Francis Rooney (FL),
veteran member Jim Sensenbrenner (WI), rising star Elise Stefanik NY), veteran member Fred Upton (MI) and former leadership member Greg Walden (OR). These magnificent 13 members ought to be complimented and financially supported in future elections.

Let's hope the Republican members of the Senate have more backbone than their House counterparts and vote to support the resolution of disapproval when they vote in a few weeks.

Monday, February 25, 2019

My Amazon Review of Laurence Leamer's "Mar-A-Lago: Inside the Gates of Power at Donald Trump's Presidential Palace"


The Sun King

Writer and Palm Beach resident Laurence Leamer has written a very breezy and gossipy history of Donald Trump’s involvement with Mar-a-Lago and through that he confirms pretty much all we know about Donald Trump. He starts with Trump’s enchantment with the Mar-a Lago estate that was formerly owned by the heiress, Marjorie Merriweather Post. Trump buys the asset for about $10 million dollars with only $300,000 of his own money. Not bad for an asset that has been much improved could now be worth $500 million.

Trump’s entrance on to the Palm Beach scene shakes that the then very stuffy community to its very foundations. He doesn’t play by the rules, sues the town many times over zoning issues and he ultimately gets his way. Where Trump does some real good he breaks the anti-Semitism of that insular community with the aid of his Jewish lawyer Paul Rampell. By the way it was Rampell’s idea to convert the estate to a club.

Leamer has obviously walked the halls of Mar-a-Lago where he has keen sense for detail and Trump’s obsession with gold. He has talked with many members and employees who tell tales of Trump’s mercurial temper, especially with his employees. To call him mean and rotten would be an understatement. But make no mistake, Trump is the Sun King of Mar-a-Lago.

Trump’s affair and later marriage to Marla Maples is a highlight of this book. Here Leamer notes that Trump did whatever he could to prevent being known that Maples had sex with one his body guards on the beach. After Maples there is, of course, Melania and their 2005 wedding was the highlight of the social season and Trump paid for it by selling the photography rights.

We also encounter the National Enquirer and Trump’s buddy Christopher Ruddy of the rightwing website Newsmax.  Leamer’s thesis is that the Donald Trump we see today was honed in the hothouse of Palm Springs. Leamer’s book isn’t great history, but it is a fun read.