Showing posts with label gerrymandering. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gerrymandering. Show all posts

Monday, July 8, 2019

My Amazon Review of Jonathan Rodden's "Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide"


The Geographic Roots of Political Polarization

Stanford political science professor and sometime Democratic Party consultant Jonathan Rodden has written an important book on how and why urban Democratic voters appear to be under-represented in Congress and state legislatures. At its very essence the median congressional/legislative district is more conservative than the median voter. This phenomenon is a result of urban liberals being geographically concentrated in overwhelmingly Democratic districts while more conservative rural and suburban voters are more geographically spread out in majority Republican districts. Thus the elimination of partisan gerrymandering would help, but not cure the fundamental disadvantage urban voters’ face.

Rodden’s data driven book goes back to the late 19th Century where urban working class oriented parties established themselves around worker housing near major railroad lines and mines. He not only discusses the U.S., but he is international in his outlook with case studies from the U.K., Australia, New Zealand, Germany and the Netherlands. He notes that where there is proportional representation urban voters are not under-represented, but with community based winner take all districts, the urban voter is under-represented.

His solution to the problem in the U.S. is for urban Democrats to be more tolerant of the views of their country and suburban cousins and therefore allow “blue dogs” into their party. That was true in the 1970s and 80s, but far less so today. In fact there are little Robespierre’s seeking to eliminate those Democrats through the primary process who don’t hold to the current liberal orthodoxy.

My guess is that the logjam will be broken when the dominant Republican and Democratic parties break up into three parties which I would name a Trumpist Populist Party, an establishment Democratic Left Hamiltonian Party and a Social Democratic left party.

Rodden’s book is very dense with data and sometimes the read is a slog, but an interested reader trying to understand the polarization of American politics can do no worse than to read his book.





Monday, July 30, 2018

Gerrymandering Won't Save the Republicans in a Wave Election

Although many political analysts believe that the Republicans will lose House seats this November, more than a few are reluctant to concede that the Democrats will take the House. Why? They believe the Republicans have a lock on the House because of all too many seats are gerrymandered in their favor. That is true in a normal election year, but it is not true in a wave election.

Below you will find an example of a gerrymandered state with 10 House seats where the electorate is evenly divided. In this example the Republicans normally will win seven out of the ten seats. I would note that in the real world there are independent voters and many Democratic districts have a far lower number of voters relative to their populations. 

                                         Example of a Gerrymander
                                            (Thousands of Voters)
                                            
                                       Dems                   Reps

District 1                        350 (70%)              150 (30%)
District 2                        350 (70%)              150 (30%)
District 3                        280 (56%)              220 (44%)
District 4                        180 (36%)              320 (64%)
District 5                        200 (40%)              300 (60%)
District 6                        220 (44%)              280 (56%)
District 7                        230 (46%)              270 (54%)
District 8                        230 (46%)              270 (54%)
District 9                        230 (46%)              270 (54%)
District 10                      230 (46%)              270 (54%)

Total                          2500000 (50%)       2500000 (50%)

In the above example all it would take is for 10% of the Republican voters in Districts 7-10 to flip for the Democrats to achieve 7-3 advantage thereby completely reversing the current line-up. In the example in those four contested seats the Dems would win by 253,000 - 247,000. The other six seats would remain as they were. Simply put any seat the Republicans now hold with a 55% or less majority is at huge risk.

As a result, as of today, given the amount of open seats currently held by Republicans and the number of other contested seats, it is very easy to visualize the Dems to pick up 50-60 House seats. That would be typical of what happened during the wave elections of 2006, 2010 and 2014.