Showing posts with label corporate finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporate finance. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

My Review of Donald Chew Jr.'s "The Making of Modern Corporate Finance"

An Ode to Modern Financial Theory

As a former professor of finance, I read Donald Chew’s book with great interest. His book is a history of the development of modern financial theory from its early roots in John Burr Williams’ 1938 “Theory of Investment Value” to its beginning in the late 1950’s with the works of Miller and Modigliani on capital structure and dividend irrelevance. He made a mistake in attributing Myron Gordon’s model to Williams. 

Chew writes in a very breezy style by referring to Michael Jensen as Mike and Stewart Myers as Stu. From his post as an editor of Stern Stewart’s “The Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,” he got to know most of the major players in academic finance. I too met many of the academics he discusses, and indeed I was an early adopter of Brealey and Myers textbook he highly praises in my corporate finance class during the 1982-83 academic year. I also met, on several occasions, his mentor, Joel Stern.

Chew makes the case that earnings per share don’t count, but rather it is the ability of a corporation to earn a return above the cost of capital with return measured as net operating profit after taxes. It is with this insight that Stern Stewart pioneered the concept of economic value added. (EVA) Indeed, instead of using earnings to value a corporation, value can be defined as the present value of the cash flow associated with existing assets plus the present value of future growth opportunities. Hence, Amazon for example, can trade at values divorced from current earnings.

However, he oversells his point that earning per share doesn’t count. Corporate management and analysts continue to stress earnings per share and woe to the company that misses its quarterly earning estimates.  In the short run earnings seem to count a great deal.

He also oversells private equity. To be sure private equity posted extraordinary returns in its first twenty years starting in the 1980’s. Since then, returns have eroded, and their risks have been underrated. Put simply, the industry is guilty of what Cliff Asness of AQR, calls “volatility washing.”

This book is of interest to readers who are interested in how modern financial theory evolved and it is helpful in understanding what forces drive stock prices in long run.

 

Monday, September 11, 2023

J.M. Smucker's Dumb Deal to Buy Hostess Brands

I am a 50-year shareholder of J.M. Smucker (SJM) and I have seen them make some great deals (Folgers Coffee $3.3 billion in 2008) and some horrible deals (Big Heart Pet Brands $5.3 billion in 2015), but their planned $5.6 billion acquisition of Twinkie maker Hostess Brands (TWNK) takes the cake. This deal is dumb on strategic and valuation grounds and family scion Paul H. Smucker is probably turning over in his grave.

It staggers the mind too think that when the sweetened snack industry is being riled by the prospect of a new class of weight loss drugs that will drive a dagger into the industry's business model, SJM decides to pay a huge premium (54% price unaffected) for TWNK, perhaps the most vulnerable company in that sector.

Compounding the strategic mistake SJM is paying a huge 17X EBITDA on 2023 numbers and an estimate 13X on SJM's estimate (aggressive in my opinion) of 2024 results allowing for synergies. To me it makes no sense for SJM which was trading at 11X EBITDA to buy a far worse business at 17X EBITDA. Further SJM compounds the problem by levering up to the gills with planned financing approximating $5 billion. That borrowing with raise its Debt/EBITDA ratio from a modest 2.2X to a junk level 4.5X. Simply put, expect SJM's P/E ratio to contract. It is no accident that SJM is trading down 7% intraday.