1960's LA Through Red-Tinted Glasses
Mike Davis and John Wiener have given us a way too long (800 pages in the print edition) history of the rise of the Left in the Los Angeles of the 1960's. In telling us everything they researched and remembered it is hard for the lay reader to separate the important from the incidental. The book would have been greatly helped by a sharp-penciled editor.
Mike Davis and John Wiener have given us a way too long (800 pages in the print edition) history of the rise of the Left in the Los Angeles of the 1960's. In telling us everything they researched and remembered it is hard for the lay reader to separate the important from the incidental. The book would have been greatly helped by a sharp-penciled editor.
In the interests of full disclosure I
knew Mike Davis in the early 1970's and had more than a passing participation in
the political and cultural events the authors discuss. In May 1965 I watched
the late and great Little Richard perform at the California Club in Watts. Two
months later Watts burned in the rebellion. The small group I was with were the
only white people in the audience. Later in January 1967 I watched The Doors at
Whisky-A-Go-Go “set the night on fire.” To
be sure I lived in the sun, sand and surf Los Angeles, not in its racism
plagued underbellies of South Central and East Los Angeles.
To me the main theme of the book is that
Los Angeles was in the vanguard of the peace, women’s, gay rights, African-American
and Chicano movements of the 1960's and that members, of which Davis was one,
former members and friends of the Communist Party were in the leadership
vanguard. Indeed Davis was mentored by the doyenne of Los Angeles communists,
Dorothy Healey. As an aside why anyone would join the Communist Party in 1968 is
beyond me. From my small vantage point I just didn’t see all that communist
influence and if it were true it would make believable all of the right wing paranoid
fantasies of that era.
Where the book is good is its description
of the US-Black Panther rivalry of that time that led to the assassination of
two members of the Panthers on the UCLA campus and the intense pressure put on
the Panthers by the F.B.I. It is particularly good at describing the risings in
African-American and Latino high schools protesting the racism of their
teachers and administrators. The authors also note that the police raid on the
gay Black Cat Tavern predated Stonewall by two years.
What the book lacks is the music. It
misses the spirit of the age which was typified by sex, drugs and rock ‘n roll.
It is way too serious because many of us had smiles on our faces and songs in
our hearts. Importantly the book lacks any discussion on the impact of the SDS
split on 1969 on the overall movement and there is no after-action report as to
why things fell apart. To use the language of the day there is really no
criticism/self-criticism. Simply put what went wrong?
Further many of the ideas promoted by
the Left of today and now I view as reactionary. Davis and Wiener talk about
the coming of the Crawford decision which implemented crosstown busing in Los
Angeles which intensified the racial polarization of the city. Instead of
advocating for ethnic studies programs in the universities which led the way to
marginal degrees, the movement should have advocated for stronger curriculums with emphasis on math, science and economics.
But alas that did not happen.
I am sure better books will be written
on the Los Angeles of the 1960's, but if a reader wants to slog through all 800 pages
they will get the big picture with way too much minutia thrown in.
For the full Amazon URL see: https://www.amazon.com/review/R46U3E2PHN8UW/ref=pe_1098610_137716200_cm_rv_eml_rv0_rv
No comments:
Post a Comment