When Giants
Roamed the Halls of Congress
University of Texas history professor
H.W. Brands has written a biography of the three giants who dominated Congress
in the first half of the 19th Century, namely Henry Clay, John
Calhoun and Daniel Webster. All three were great intellects and orators who had
a common dislike, for different reasons, of President Andrew Jackson.
Clay comes on the scene in 1811 where in
his first term he becomes Speaker of the House. He and Calhoun would join
together as the leading “war hawks” and push Madison into war against England.
They would later split over the issues of tariffs, slavery and most important,
the preservation of the Union. Clay would become the author of the American
System based on protective tariffs, internal improvements and a national bank
which made him the true heir to Alexander Hamilton. In 1820 he would put
together the Missouri Compromise which delayed the ultimate reckoning of the
slavery issue and thereby allowed the continued development of a growing America.
Calhoun, who served as vice-president to
both John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, quite a feat in its own right, became
the tribune of the South. He fought tariffs, championed slavery and the ability
of states to nullify federal laws they opposed which offered the theoretical
basis for secession.
Webster had a brilliant career as a
lawyer where he was victorious in such major Supreme Court cases as McCulloch
v. Maryland, Dartmouth College and Gibbons v. Ogden. Although he is most
remembered for his “Union, now and forever” speech in his Reply to Hayne, he
supported New England secession during the War of 1812.
In 1850 all three of them, now all over
70, came together in the great debate over the admission of California into the
Union as a free state, the treatment of fugitive slaves and the extension of
slavery into the New Mexico Territory. The end result of the debate was yet
another successful Clay compromise. And it was here where Webster in order to
save the Union bent over backwards against his abolitionist constituency, on
the issues of fugitive slaves and slavery in the New Mexico Territory, to agree
with Clay. Oh to be in the Senate Gallery to hear the debate. The next best
thing is reading Brands’ account. All three would be dead within two years.
Brands brings to life these three great
personalities as they dominated the Congress for 40 years. It is history at its
best. I only wish our current Congress had at least one Clay or a Webster and
unfortunately too much of the nullification spirit of John Calhoun is alive and
well in both parties today.
The full Amazon URL appears at: https://www.amazon.com/review/R2JBQPK21E3ID1/ref=pe_1098610_137716200_cm_rv_eml_rv0_rv
No comments:
Post a Comment