Regime Change
David
Shulman
Senior
Economist
UCLA
Anderson Forecast
March
2018
The sudden 10% decline in stock prices (see Table) and the rise in
long-term interest rates in early February signaled what economists call a
“regime change.” (See Figures 1 and 2) The economic environment is changing
from one of sluggish growth and low inflation to one of accelerating growth and
moderate inflation. Moreover, monetary policy is transitioning from one of
accommodation to one of normalization and fiscal policy is moving from a
moderate deficit to a high deficit regime with trillion dollar deficits in the
on deck circle. (See Figure 3) The $300 billion budget compromise (2 years)
combined with the recently enacted $1.5 trillion dollar tax cuts (10 years)
highlighted the demise of the so called deficit hawks. Included in the budget
compromise was a substantial increase in defense spending which ratified our
long held belief that the era of contraction in that sector is over. (See
Figure 4)
Figure 1. S&P 500 Index , 24Feb17 – 23Feb18
Sources: Standard and Poor’s via BigCharts.com
Figure 2. 10-Year U.S. Treasury
Bond Yields, 24Feb17 – 23Feb18
Sources: BigCharts.com
Insert Box
Will the 2018 Stock Market Be a Rerun of
1987?
The quick run-up in stock prices in January took place under a
backdrop very reminiscent of the boom and crash in stock prices that took place
in 1987. Recall that the S&P 500 advanced 33% from January-August 1987,
only to decline by 39% by October. Further, like 1987 there was a Fed
transition from Volcker to Greenspan in August of that year while Powell
replaced Yellen in January of this year. However, unlike 1987, stocks dropped
10% in January, while in 1987 a similar drop took place in April. The Table
below highlights the similarities and a few differences between 2018 and 1987.
Similarities
Indicator January 1987 January 2018
S&P 500 +13.2% +7.5%*
Extended Bull Market Started 8/82 Started 3/09
Computer Trading Portfolio Insurance Algo Trading
Economy Strengthening Strengthening
Profit Growth Accelerating Accelerating
Dollar Weakening Weakening
Oil Prices Up from lows Up from lows
Inflation Rate Increasing Increasing
Fed Tightening Tightening
10-Year Treasury Yields Bottoming, about to rise Rising
Pro-Growth Tax Reform 1986 Tax Act 2017 Tax Act
Trade Tensions Japan/Germany China/NAFTA
White House Scandal Iran/Contra Russian Interference
Differences
Europe Uniting Dividing
Big Power Rivalry Declining Increasing
Shiller CAPE 14X 35X
*-As of January 26.
Indicator January 1987 January 2018
S&P 500 +13.2% +7.5%*
Extended Bull Market Started 8/82 Started 3/09
Computer Trading Portfolio Insurance Algo Trading
Economy Strengthening Strengthening
Profit Growth Accelerating Accelerating
Dollar Weakening Weakening
Oil Prices Up from lows Up from lows
Inflation Rate Increasing Increasing
Fed Tightening Tightening
10-Year Treasury Yields Bottoming, about to rise Rising
Pro-Growth Tax Reform 1986 Tax Act 2017 Tax Act
Trade Tensions Japan/Germany China/NAFTA
White House Scandal Iran/Contra Russian Interference
Differences
Europe Uniting Dividing
Big Power Rivalry Declining Increasing
Shiller CAPE 14X 35X
*-As of January 26.
Source: https://shulmaven.blogspot.com/2018/01/eerie-parallels-january-2018-january.html
Close Box
Figure 3. Federal Deficit, FY 2010 -FY2020
Sources: Office of Management and Budget and UCLA Anderson
Forecast
Figure 4. Real Defense Purchases, 2010 – 2020
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast
Growth Driven by
Business Investment
Spurred by rising business fixed investment, real GDP growth is on
track to continue its 3% pace established in the second quarter of 2017. (See
Figure 5) For all of 2018 we forecast a growth rate of 2.9%, but that will slow
to 2.6% in 2019 and a sluggish 1.6% in 2020. Why the slowdown? Simply put, the
economy is already operating at full employment and it is bound by slow labor
force growth and sluggish productivity. Nevertheless, job growth will continue,
albeit at a slower clip than in recent years and the unemployment rate will hit
3.5% in early 2019. (See Figures 6 and 7)
Figure 5. Real GDP Growth, 2010Q1 – 20120Q4F
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast
Figure 6. Payroll Employment, 2010Q1 -2020Q4F
Sources U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and UCLA Anderson Forecast
Figure 7. Unemployment Rate, 2010Q1 – 2020Q4
Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and UCLA Anderson
Forecast
As we mentioned above, the key driver of the economy will be
business fixed investment. All three categories of business fixed investment
(equipment, intellectual property and structures) will be expanding robustly in
2018 with real equipment spending leading the way with a gain of 8.4%. (See
Figures 8, 9, and 10) Business investment is responding to pent-up demand, the
near moratorium on new regulations by the Trump Administration as well as the
reduction in business taxation and the new 100% expensing rules for the
depreciation of capital equipment. Nevertheless, growth here will slow as the
economy begins to operate at its full potential.
Figure 8. Real Equipment Spending, 2010Q1 -20120Q4F
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast
Figure 9. Real Intellectual Property Spending, 2010Q1 – 2020Q4F
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast
Figure 10. Real Business Investment in Structures, 2010Q1 -2020Q4F
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast
No Boom for
Housing
Although housing activity will continue to expand through 2019, it
will be far from a boom. Higher interest rates (discussed below) and higher
home prices will take their toll on housing starts. (See Figure 11) Simply put,
if we didn’t have a housing boom with mortgage rates below 4%, how will we have
one when mortgage rates exceed 5%? Thus, after recording 1.2 million housing
starts in 2017, we are forecasting 1.3 million units in 2018 and 1.38 million
and 1.36 million units in 2019 and 2020, respectively.
Figure 11. Housing Starts, 2010Q1 – 2020Q4
Sources: U.S. bureau of the Census and UCLA Anderson Forecast
A Blow Out in the
Trade Deficit
Although President Trump has railed against the trade deficit, the
stepped up pace of economic activity along with increase in the federal deficit
will cause the trade deficit, as
measured by real net exports, to increase from $620 billion in 2017 to nearly
$800 billion in 2020. (See Figure 12) Because the United States is
consuming more than it is producing it has to make up the difference through
imports. As a result, the Trump fiscal policy will be playing a major role in
increasing the trade deficit. Moreover, instead of improving the situation, the
Trump Administration proposals to increase tariffs on steel and aluminum will
actually make things worse as domestic costs rise and foreign producers
retaliate.
Figure 12. Real Net Exports, 2010 -2020
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce and UCLA Anderson Forecast
Higher Wages, Inflation
and Interest Rates Ahead
One of the triggers of the stock market sell-off in early February
was a reported increase in average hourly earnings of 0.3% in January over
December. Instead of using hourly earnings we prefer to use the employee
compensation index as a better measure of the strength of the labor market
largely because that index includes bonuses and benefits. In 2017 that index
increased at a very modest rate of 1.4% over 2016, but the quarterly run rate for
2018 will likely be above 4% and approach 4.5% by 2020. (See Figure 13) This is
how a fully employed economy is supposed to behave.
Figure 13. Employee Compensation per Hour, 2010Q1 – 2020Q4F
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and UCLA Anderson Forecast
Inflation is not as quiescent as it was earlier in the decade. The
fears of deflation have abated and for the first time since 2012, the consumer
price index increased by over 2%. Going
forward, with the end of the oil price rout and rising wages coming from an
increasingly tight labor market, inflation as measured by both the headline and
core consumer price indices will exceed 2% over the forecast horizon and likely
reach 3% in 2020. (See Figure 14) Indeed, the month-over-month increases
reported for January in the headline and core consumer price indices of 0.5%
and 0.3%, respectively, is supportive of our view. Moreover, the price cuts for
cellular services will anniversary this spring and that will trigger a near
automatic increase in year-over-year inflation.
Figure 14. Headline vs. Core Consumer Price Index, 2010Q1 -2020Q,
Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and UCLA Anderson
Forecast
In a fully employed economy, with rising inflation and an
exploding federal deficit, what is a central bank supposed to do? The answer is
obvious. The Fed will become more
aggressive in raising interest rates. We are forecasting four quarter point
hikes in the federal funds rate this year and continued increases throughout
the forecast horizon to a target of 3.25% - 3.5% in 2020. (See Figure 15) We
are aware that this looks very aggressive, but we would surmise that former Fed
Chair Janet Yellen would be on board with this. Why? She, as an adherent of the
Phillips Curve, would be troubled by our and other forecasts of a 3.5%
unemployment rate which would signal oncoming inflation and as a neo-Keynesian
economist she would be horrified at trillion dollar federal deficits being
overlaid on a fully employed economy. We would expect no less from Jay Powell,
the new Fed chair.
Given the prospect of rising inflation and a substantial increase
in Treasury issuance arising from the deficit, long-term interest rates will
likely surprise on the upside. Further, with the Fed shrinking its balance
sheet, which in effect works as a net issuance of government securities, the
long shortage of “safe assets” is about to come to an end with a vengeance.
Further, with both Europe and Japan now firmly in recovery modes, their periods
of unusually low interest rates are also about to come to an end. Thus, we would not be surprised to see the
10-Year Treasury yields exceeding 3.5% this year and cross 4% in 2019.
Figure 15. Federal Funds vs.10-Year U.S. Treasury Yields, 2010Q1 -2020Q4
Sources: Federal Reserve Board and UCLA Anderson Forecast
Conclusion
The title for the report is “Regime Change.” We mean it. The Trump
Administration has put in place an all-out stimulus policy on top of a fully
employed economy. As with an automobile,
when an economy runs hot, sometimes a few gaskets break. Near-term, spurred
by strong business fixed investment, the outlook is for continued 3% growth,
but as we enter 2019 the economy could very well begin to sputter under the
strains of higher inflation and interest rates and by 2020 it could very well
stall out.
No comments:
Post a Comment