Good Governance is Hard to Do
Francis Fukuyama of “The End of History
and the Last Man” has written a lengthy history of comparative government from 1800 to the
modern era. In Political Order he discusses why certain governments succeed
while others fail. His sweep covers the
globe from Europe to the Americas, to Asia and to Africa. Though too long the
narrative is breathtaking.
His thesis is that successful governance
requires a coherent state, laws that are equally enforced and system of
accountability, usually, but necessarily through elections. Weak governance
gets one or all three of these factors wrong, Fukuyama although in many ways
quite conservative, is political progressive in the early 20th
Century sense in that a successful state needs a highly trained impartial
bureaucracy. Examples of such are the U.S. between 1900- 1950, Germany and
England in the 19th century. To be sure bureaucracies that become
too independent can go out of control. His example of this is the German
military on the eve of World War 1.
On the other hand there can be too much
accountability. In this instance he highlights the role of interest groups in
the U.S. who in total possess veto power over what the state can do, a
“vetocracy” if you will.
Fukuyama’s book should be read in
conjunction with Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson’s “Why Nations Fail.” Simply
put both argue that the success of rent seeking clienteles have the power
corrupt government for their own ends.
Although “Political Order…” is a great
text, it is a tough read for the lay reader, hence four stars.
For the Amazon URL see:
http://www.amazon.com/review/RBH6T3L6A0CJN
No comments:
Post a Comment